The analysis indicated that the partnership amongst the linear combinations out of the 2 categories of parameters you certainly will top end up being explained of the you to definitely function with a great Remote-controlled worth of
On the PSPP, five points emerged, identified as real self-value, sports competence, health, physical electricity, and attractive looks which have eigenvalues of 1.78, 4.34, step 3.59, step 3.46, and you will six.08 correspondingly bookkeeping to have 64% of the variance among items. In contrast to the latest proposed hierarchical model (Fox Corbin, 1989), but not, the actual mind-worthy of size additionally the attractive looks subscale shown big grounds overlap and you will was basically subsequently deleted away from subsequent data. It factor convergence within attractive body and you will bodily notice-worthy of balances has been claimed in other places (Sonstroem ainsi que al., 1992). The rest three subscales from actual mind-perceptions accounted for 38% of your own variation on questionnaire affairs. Cronbach (1951) alphas for these subscales was basically .ninety to have recreations proficiency (6 activities), .86 for health (six facts), and you may .85 for actual electricity (six issues).
The POSQ plus showed an obvious factor construction getting interpretation. Two facts emerged which have eigenvalues higher than step 1.00 and you will was identified as task (six affairs) and you can pride positioning (6 facts) to possess get it done, bookkeeping having 34% and 21% of variance when you look at the participants’ responses, correspondingly. The latest interfactor relationship try minimal (r = .04), consistent with earlier browse (Cost Roberts, 1994; Roberts Value 1995) verifying orthogonality of the two products. Alpha coefficients have been .71 and you can .ninety for the task and pride orientation having exercise subscales, respectively.
To help you look at the brand new multivariate dating involving the linear combination of these two sets of variables comprising real thinking-perceptions/purpose orientations getting take action, and you may indices out-of built-in motivation to own do so, canonical relationship are did
This new IMI also shown a steady foundation build just like the all of the items stacked on their respective activities conference minimal traditional become chose for translation. Eigenvalues was indeed greater than 1.00 into the desire/thrills (5 things), thought of competence (4 facts), effort/strengths (5 facts), and you may pressure/pressure (4 points) inherent inspiration subscales, correspondingly, accounting to own sixty.1% of your variance in the products. Inner reliability coefficients had been .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (sensed competence), .76 (effort/ importance), and you will .77 (tension/ pressure) into the built-in desire getting exercise subscales.
Form and standard deviations of your own actual self-perception (PSPP), task and you can pride orientations to have do so (POSQ), and you can intrinsic desire to possess exercise (IMI) subscales are shown within the Dining table step one. Significant zero buy correlations (2-tailed) was basically seen ranging from activity direction to possess do so and you may one another focus/enjoyment (r .29), and energy/advantages (r = .36). Self-perceptions out-of shape had been associated so you can notice/exhilaration (roentgen = .49), perceived skills (roentgen .59), effort/importance (roentgen = .49), and tension/tension (roentgen = -.27).
The newest predictor details were including thinking-thinking out of football proficiency, health, and you will physical fuel, as well as task and you can pride orientations to have exercise. The fresh standards variables contained the new five actions off intrinsic motivation to have do so, particularly, interest/exhilaration, seen competence, effort/advantages, and stress/stress.
74 wing seznamovacÃ aplikace, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).